SOURCES SOUGHT
F -- Lab. Analysis for Environmental Water Samples-Inorganic Parameters
- Notice Date
- 11/27/2015
- Notice Type
- Sources Sought
- NAICS
- 541380
— Testing Laboratories
- Contracting Office
- Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region Regional Office Division of Acquisition Services 2800 Cottage Way, Room E-1815 Sacramento CA 95825-1898 US
- ZIP Code
- 00000
- Solicitation Number
- R16PS00135
- Response Due
- 12/4/2015
- Archive Date
- 12/19/2015
- Point of Contact
- Lee, Jong
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- This announcement is hereby issued to Small Business (per the NAICS Code below), 8(a) Small Business, HUBZone Small Business Women Owned Small Business, and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business concerns that may be interested in performing a contract for the Mid-Pacific Region of the Bureau of Reclamation. The work to be performed is described below. Based upon responses to this announcement, the Government may determine to set this acquisition aside or proceed with an unrestricted solicitation. The applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code is 541380 and the related small business size standard is $15 million. This notice is not a request for proposals/quotations and the information presented in this announcement will not obligate the Bureau of Reclamation in any manner. Interested parties should include the following information in their response: (a) Business name, address, cage code, size classification based on NAICS size standard, socioeconomic classification (i.e. HUBZone and/or 8(a)), and a point of contact; (b) A positive statement of your intention to submit an offer for this solicitation as a prime contractor; (c) Evidence of your experience performing work similar in type and scope to the work in this announcement within the last five years. The evidence should include: contract numbers, project titles, dollar amounts and points of contacts with telephone numbers. Please do not include more than three past projects; and (d) Include attachments cataloging the company ¿s equipment assets, personnel resources and financial resources that demonstrate company responsibility and capability to perform required work. All interested parties are encouraged to respond to this notice with all documents, by EMAIL to jmlee@usbr.gov no later than 4:00 pm PST on December 4, 2015. The information provided in this announcement is the only information the Government has available at this time. There are no specifications, drawings, bid packages, or source lists available. Questions concerning the sources sought should be directed to Jong Lee by email. No phone calls please. The principal components of the work to be performed include: 1. Laboratory Analysis for Environmental Water Sampling Services-Inorganic Parameters a. Samples: 0001SM 2320B /EPA 310.1Alkalinity: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 6700 0002EPA 200.8 or 6020Aluminum: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 29 0003EPA 350.1 Ammonia as Nitrogen: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 360 0004EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Antimony: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 2 0005EPA 200.8 or EPPA 6020Arsenic: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 3 0006EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Barium: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 33 0007EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Beryllium: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 1.3 0008EPA 200.7 or EPA 6020Boron: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 330 0009EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Cadmium: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 0.33 0010EPA 410.4 Chemical Oxygen Demand: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 7000 0011EPA 300.0 Chloride: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 3500 0012EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Chromium: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 16 0013EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Copper: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 3 0014SM 4500F-C or EPA 300.0 Fluoride: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 230 0015EPA 200.7 or EPA 6010Iron: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 100 0016EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Lead: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 0.8 0017EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Manganese: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 16. 0018EPA 245.1 or EPA 7470Mercury: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 0.25 0019EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Molybdenum: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 3.3 0020EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Nickel: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 3.3 0021EPA 353.2 Nitrate+Nitrite as Nitrogen: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 15000 0022SM 4500PE/ EPA 365.1Phosphorous: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 50 0023EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Silver: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 1.0 0024EPA 200.7 or EPA 6010Sodium: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 23000 0025EPA 300.0 Sulfate: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 166600 0026EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Thallium: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 0.66 0027SM 2540C Total Dissolved Solids: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 33300 0028EPA 351.2Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen: Maximum Reporting Limit µg/L 400 0029SM 5310CTotal Organic Carbon: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 500 0030EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Uranium ¿ Dissolved: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 10 0031EPA 200.8 or EPA 6020Zinc ¿ Dissolved: Maximum Reporting Limit ug/L 40 The following Line Items are Optional Line Items and will be exercised only if needed. 0032 Option Line ItemEPA 1631Mercury ¿ Analyze with a reporting limit at 2 ng/L 0033 Option Line ItemEPA 900.0Gross Alpha ¿ Analyze with a reporting limit of 3 pCi/L 0034 Option Line ItemEPA 314Perchlorate ¿ Analyze with a reporting limit of 1 ug/L 0035 Option Line ItemSM 4500CN-ECyanide ¿ Analyze with a reporting limit of 3ug/L 2. The Contractor/laboratory may not sub contract any analysis out. 3. In order to receive an award the laboratory shall be approved by Mid-Pacific Region ¿s Quality Assurance and Data Management Branch, MP-156. Approval will include but not be limited to passing a Quality Assurance Audit as stated below, receiving an acceptable review of the laboratory ¿s QA Manual, round-robin performance evaluation samples, and reporting limits. Audit Process: The MP-156 quality assurance (QA) section conducts audits on laboratories involved in analytical activities that support Mid-Pacific Region projects. The audit consists of reviewing the laboratory ¿s QA manual and the last three years of approved round-robin performance study results, submitting performance evaluation samples, and conducting an onsite audit. The review process allows the QA section to determine if laboratories are capable of performing quality analyses on Mid-Pacific Region samples while following QA/QC practices that meet or exceed Mid-Pacific Region standards and protocols. Background Review: Prior to the audit, the QA section will contact the laboratory QA officer or the laboratory director and request a copy of both the current QA manual and the last three years of approved round-robin performance study results. The performance study results and QA manual are reviewed by the QA section. Performance Evaluation Samples: Prior to the onsite audit, the QA section conducts a performance audit by submitting performance evaluation samples. The purpose of the performance evaluation samples is to evaluate the laboratory ¿s ability to generate accurate data. If the laboratory performs poorly on the performance evaluation samples, the QA section may consider not conducting the onsite audit. The parameters submitted for the performance evaluation samples will be tailored to reflect those of current Mid-Pacific Region projects and the methods the laboratory performs. If the laboratory does not obtain a result within the acceptance criteria, the laboratory will be directed to reanalyze the sample(s). If the reanalyzed result is within the acceptance criteria, then the performance audit is considered acceptable. If the laboratory still does not meet the acceptance criteria upon reanalysis, a new performance evaluation sample from a different lot or vendor will be submitted. If the laboratory can obtain an acceptable result on the new performance evaluation sample, the performance audit is considered acceptable. If the laboratory does not meet the acceptance on the original, reanalysis, or new performance evaluation sample, the laboratory will not be audited or approved for this method/parameter. Audit Agenda: Approximately one week prior to the audit, the auditor will send the laboratory contact a proposed audit agenda. The audit agenda details the time allotted for the initial meeting with management, analytical method review, document review, and debrief. After laboratory review and approval, the audit agenda will be finalized. Onsite Audit: An onsite laboratory audit is conducted by the QA section to assess the laboratory ¿s expertise in conducting the analyses, the capability for producing valid data, the ability to effectively support the data, and the integrity of the QA/QC practices. Meet with Management: The first step of the audit will be to meet with management and key laboratory personnel to discuss the purpose of the audit and give a general overview about the Mid-Pacific Region and the Quality Assurance and Data Management Branch (MP-156). During this meeting, the audit team will discuss MP-156 ¿s policies and requirements, the performance evaluation sample results (if available), document request, and questions for the QA Officer (QAO). Analytical Method and Document Review: During the onsite audit, the QA officer, analysts, and other key laboratory personnel are questioned to determine their overall understanding of the methods and laboratory procedures. Documentation practices are also reviewed. In general, the auditors are checking to see if the laboratory procedures follow the laboratory ¿s QA manual guidelines and the EPA method, Standard method, or other method protocols. Debrief: The most serious deviations are presented to the laboratory as findings in a debrief meeting at the end of the audit; the debrief is generally conducted the day after the audit. All the deviations are written as findings or observations in the final audit report. Audit Report: Any deviations from accepted protocols are written in an audit report as findings. The report can also include good practices for any procedures that the auditors would like the laboratory to continue and observations for any procedures that the auditors would like the laboratory to adopt. Laboratory Audit Response and Final Approval Letter: The laboratory is asked to send a response to each finding detailed in the QA section ¿s audit report. The auditors will review this response and assess if the corrective actions and explanations are acceptable. If any response is questionable, the laboratory is contacted for clarification. Once the review of the laboratory ¿s audit response is complete, the lead auditor will send a final letter addressing whether or not the laboratory is approved for use. System for Award Management (SAM), as required by FAR 4.1102, applies to this procurement. Prospective contractors must be registered prior to award. Lack of registration in the SAM database will make an offeror ineligible for award. Information on SAM registration can be obtained via the Internet at https://www.sam.gov.
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/notices/c7d1535d192c4e8ff611dedc41019588)
- Place of Performance
- Address: Bureau of Reclamation 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento CA 95825 USA
- Zip Code: 95825
- Zip Code: 95825
- Record
- SN03955864-W 20151129/151127233315-c7d1535d192c4e8ff611dedc41019588 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |