Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2011 FBO #3592
MODIFICATION

M -- Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for Navajo Gallup Water Supply Project

Notice Date
9/23/2011
 
Notice Type
Modification/Amendment
 
Contracting Office
Bureau of Reclamation-DO-Acquisition Operations Group PO Box 25007, 84-27810 Denver CO 80225
 
ZIP Code
80225
 
Solicitation Number
R11PA81507
 
Response Due
9/30/2011
 
Archive Date
9/22/2012
 
Point of Contact
Paul Pierson Contract Specialist 3034452440 ppierson@usbr.gov;
 
E-Mail Address
Point of Contact above, or if none listed, contact the IDEAS EC HELP DESK for assistance
(EC_helpdesk@NBC.GOV)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
The purpose of this amendment is to make the following clarifications to the Evaluation Criteria: 1. Section 1.0 is changed from: Evaluation Criteria: The following shall be evaluated when determining the most qualified Contractor for award. Technical capability is more important than the other three criteria. To: Evaluation Criteria: The following shall be evaluated when determining the most qualified Contractor for award. Technical capability is more important than past performance and price. 2. Section 2.0 is changed from: Basis for Award: Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the most advantageous method for the Government to meet the objectives outlined in the PWS. Technical factor 1.5 is considered more important than factors 1.1 through 1.4; technical evaluation factors 1.1 through 1.4 are of equal importance. Technical evaluation factors and past performance, when combined, are significantly more important than price. Award may not necessarily be made for technical capabilities that would appear to exceed those needed for the successful performance of the work. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is determined to be in the best interest of the Government. To: Basis for Award: Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the most advantageous method for the Government to meet the objectives outlined in the PWS. The order of importance for technical factors is as follows: 1.1 - Technical approach/expertise is the most important of the 5 technical sub-factors; 1.5 - Schedule is more important than sub-factors 1.2, 1.3, & 1.4; 1.2 is more important than 1.3 & 1.4; and, technical sub-factors 1.3 & 1.4 are of equal importance (order of precedence - 1.1, 1.5, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4). Technical evaluation factors and past performance, when combined, are significantly more important than price. Award may not necessarily be made for technical capabilities that would appear to exceed those needed for the successful performance of the work. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is determined to be in the best interest of the Government. 3. All Other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/notices/c81ca7ffc188241908340cc7b8bf6b40)
 
Place of Performance
Address: Fruitland, NM
Zip Code: 87417
 
Record
SN02590949-W 20110925/110924000500-c81ca7ffc188241908340cc7b8bf6b40 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  © 1994-2020, Loren Data Corp.