MODIFICATION
R -- Statement of Condition Surveys
- Notice Date
- 3/16/2011
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 541350
— Building Inspection Services
- Contracting Office
- Department of Veterans Affairs;Contracting Office (138C);5001 N. Piedras Street;El Paso TX 79930-4221
- ZIP Code
- 79930-4221
- Solicitation Number
- VA25811RP0129
- Response Due
- 3/25/2011
- Archive Date
- 6/23/2011
- Point of Contact
- Carlos Jaquez
- E-Mail Address
-
Contract Specialist
(carlos.jaquez@va.gov)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
- Description
- The Past Performance Survey due date has changed from March 18th to March 25th. SUBJECT: Past Performance Survey FOR PROVIDERS OF PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION VISN 18 Contracting El Paso, Texas, has issued a solicitation to provide Joint Commission's Statement of Conditions (SOC) Survey for Patient Care Buildings at the Albuquerque VA. Past performance information will be used to evaluate quotes received. Section A of the enclosed survey lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to VISN 18 Contracting El Paso, Texas. An individual knowledgeable of the contractor's quality of supplies or services rendered should complete the survey, providing comments wherever applicable. However, supplemental information from others in your organization is encouraged. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate survey for each contract being evaluated. Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing it is greatly appreciated. The survey should be completed as soon as possible but not later than March 25, 2011 2 PM ET. Send electronically to carlos.jaquez@va.gov Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request. SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to respondent) 1. Prospective Government Contractor's______________________________________ Name and Address: ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ 2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________ 3. Phone number (with area code):___________________________________________ 4. Contract number:___________________________________________ 5. Description of Supplies/Services provided under contract referenced in item 4: _____________________________________________________________________________ 6. Contract award date: ___________Contract award amount: _________________ 7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: __________________________________________________ 8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this survey to VISN 18 Contracting, El Paso, TX ____________________________________________ (Signature) _____________________________________________ __________________________ (Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date) SECTION B: Respondent Information (to be completed by respondent) ____________________________________________ __________________________ (Signature) (Date) ______________________________ __________________________ (Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name) ______________________________ (Title) ____________________________________________________________ (Phone Number) (Organization Address) Respondent should complete survey and submit No later than: March 25, 2011 2 PM ET Email completed survey to carlos.jaquez@va.gov The following Rating Scale provides the definitions for the Past Performance ratings to be assessed: EEXCEPTIONAL Based on the Offeror's performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has met contractual requirements and has exceeded some to the respondent's benefit. Contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective action(s) taken by the contractor were highly effective. VVERY GOOD Based on the Offeror's performance record, little doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has met contractual requirements and has exceeded some to the respondent's benefit. Contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problem(s) for which corrective action(s) taken by the contractor were effective. SSATISFACTORY Based on the Offeror's performance record, some doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has met contractual requirements. Contractual performance contains some minor problem(s) for which corrective action(s) taken by the contractor appear or where satisfactory. MMARGINAL Based on Offeror's performance record, substantial doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has not met some contractual requirements. Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which either the contractor has not yet identified correction action(s), or the proposed corrective action(s) appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. UUNSATISFACTORY Based on Offeror's performance record, extreme doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has not met most contractual requirements, and recovery did not occur or was not in a timely manner. Contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective action(s) appear or were ineffective. NNEUTRAL No performance record identifiable; unknown performance. The questions on the survey shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided. QUALITY OF SERVICE 1. Rate the contractor's compliance with contractualE V S M U N requirements. 2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.E V S M U N COMMENTS: SCHEDULE 1. Delivery of service was within required time E V S M U N period specified by contract requirements. 2. Overall rating of contractor conformance to E V S M U N schedule. COMMENTS: BUSINESS RELATIONS 1. Rate the working relationship between contractor'sE V S M U N management, your company and your designated representatives (to include inspection personnel). 2. Rate the contractor's ability to submit reportsE V S M U N and/or invoices. Are they complete and accurate? 3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit requiredE V S M U N reports and/or invoices in a timely manner. 4. Rate the contractors responsiveness to customerE V S M U N complaint resolution. 5. Overall rating of contractor's business relations.E V S M U N COMMENTS: How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor? ______ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor. ______ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor. ______ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed. ______ Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor. ______ Would not award another contract to this contractor. COMMENTS: ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/VA/VAEPHCC756/VAEPHCC756/VA25811RP0129/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: Department of Veterans Affairs;1501 San Pedro Dr SE;Engineering Safety 138;Albuquerque, NM
- Zip Code: 87108-5154
- Zip Code: 87108-5154
- Record
- SN02401861-W 20110318/110316234222-63d288e18a5b831cf9c01304a4b425a6 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |