MODIFICATION
R -- Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) - Updated Shipping and Receiving Estimates
- Notice Date
- 2/25/2011
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 517919
— All Other Telecommunications
- Contracting Office
- DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; OO ALC GHSK SPACE 3CI;6049WARDLEIGH RD BLDG 1207; HILL AIR FORCE BASE; UT; 84056
- ZIP Code
- 84056
- Solicitation Number
- FA8217-11-R-72515
- Response Due
- 3/25/2011
- Point of Contact
- Jody L Lindley, Phone: 801- 586-1126, Patricia L Hunka, Phone: 801-586-3360
- E-Mail Address
-
jody.lindley@hill.af.mil, patricia.hunka@hill.af.mil
(jody.lindley@hill.af.mil, patricia.hunka@hill.af.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- Updated Shipping and Receiving Estimates Q: Can verifiable resumes with extensive TDC experience be submitted in lieu of contract numbers referencing telecommunications experience. A: You may submit any supporting data that is traceable evidence of experience. Q: Regarding the spares parts price listing, we have contacted a number of the vendors that are listed on the spare parts list and we have been told that some of these part numbers no longer exists. Is there a list with other vendors that may have an updated parts number listing? A: We are updating the known obsolete parts and will post an amendment to the RFP. Should there be others, please identify the obsolete parts and we will research. Q: Multiple questions regarding duplication on Spares Part Numbers and Descriptions on the TEP. A: The RFP has been amended to reflect the changes to TEP for the Spares. ELINs that have been modified are: S009, S016, S107, S173, S197, S264, S337, S393, S394, S431, and S553. Q: Need specs or a contact with the supplier that is familiar with these items on the Spares Worksheet. ELINs S069, S095, S168, S371, and S372. A: S069, Email lseymour@massmachine.com (781) 467-3550 S095, Technology Advancement Group www.tag.com S168, 61 Main Street Winthrop, Me 04364 (207) 377-3125 S371 and S372, 224 Ash St. Reading, MA (781) 942-5856 Q: For one item related to the repairs example (Attachment 2 - TDC Sample Pricing Worksheet): Line item GPS SYNC Server - under the problem it says "no corrective action taken NPF". Request clarification and more detailed information on the repair problem to make a more accurate estimate of costs to repair? A: The example shows an equipment item that was sent in from the field to the depot. The depot in turn sent it to the OEM for evaluation. OEM performed the evaluation with the results of no problem were found with the equipment. The OEM will still charge for an evaluation fee to troubleshoot the equipment. The Government is looking for the price of the OEM fee for this example. Q: Reference Historical TDC Repair data spreadsheet. Line items include part name, part number and description. In many cases, the part number of the repair is identical to the description of the repair. In order to better access repair volumes and the types of repairs that we can expect, please provide a more detailed description of each repair along with the frequency of each repair, over the previous 3 years, to assist with repair trend analysis. A: Repairs are CRNF. Contractors shall be reimbursed for repair items. Q: Reference Attachment 1 - TDC Spares Pricing Worksheet - understand that refurbished equipment is acceptable after approval of the Government QAP during contract implementation. In the part number/description column on this worksheet, some line items are marked refurbished; some do not say refurbished. We have found many items that are not listed as refurbished on the worksheet that we can purchase refurbished which will result in lower pricing. For proposal pricing purposes, does the Government request that we obtain refurbished equipment pricing in all cases or instead, to only provide spares price quotes for refurbished items when the description says "refurbed"? A: The Contractor can price spares at either new or refurbished. If the only parts that can be found are refurbished then that is what the Gov will need to accept. Q: We reviewed the "shipping and Receiving History" sheet posted 17 February 2011. Is there an error in wording on group at bottom of the page under "inbound shipping"? The label for the bottom table reads "Total Number of IR-items Shipped from the Depot". That same labeling is at top of the page under outbound shipping. Should the bottom table read "received" vice "shipped"? A: The shipping and receiving history has been updated to read correctly. Please see updated shipping and receiving attachment. Q: Can the Technical Orders showing system breakdown be made available? A: The Technical Orders have not been created yet. They will be made available after award of contract. Q: The proposal file "TDC Pricing Worksheet-Attachment 1". The items listed in attachment to this email are missing correct part numbers or new part numbers where we have been told the item is obsolete. Request correct part numbers so pricing for CLIN 0003 can be completed. A: Some of the part numbers/descriptions have been updated on the RFP amendment. The vendor listed on the Spares Attachment is a suggested source. The Government was able to google the part numbers or descriptions and find places to purchase the items.
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/OOALC/FA8217-11-R-72515/listing.html)
- Record
- SN02387969-W 20110227/110225234423-917d55cdfccda8575f3ce9b1f11fb734 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |