Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF MAY 21, 2010 FBO #3100
MODIFICATION

A -- Amendment to W5j9CQ-10-R-0008F -- Negotiations and Developing and Validating a Classroom-based Methodology.

Notice Date
5/19/2010
 
Notice Type
Modification/Amendment
 
NAICS
541720 — Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
 
Contracting Office
USACE Geospatial Center, CONTRACTING DIVISION, 7701 TELEGRAPH RD BLDG 2592, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22315-3864
 
ZIP Code
22315-3864
 
Solicitation Number
W5J9CQ-10-R-0008F
 
Response Due
7/1/2010
 
Archive Date
8/30/2010
 
Point of Contact
Diane E. Zartman, 703-428-1024
 
E-Mail Address
USACE Geospatial Center
(diane.e.zartman@usace.army.mil)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
This amendment provides answers to questions submitted by prospective offerors: 1. What are the projected number of staff months for this project? ARI doesnt calculate staff months, but the Contractor Manpower Equivalent is approximately.95. 2. Just to clarify, the Influence and Negotiation Training is an in-class course, correct? As opposed to computer-based, mobile, or distributed training. Yes, classroom based, instructor led would be preferred. However, elegant and wise use of computer-based simulations, etc, would not be out of order, keeping in mind a limited budget and lessening of returns on 'bang for buck' sometimes involved in the use of technology. 3. What do you have in mind for delivering the train-the-trainer feedback system? Can this be a computer-based or a combo of computer and paper-based (i.e., to take out to the field exercises) The deliverable would most likely be a checklist or other tool for the Trainer/Mentor and Soldier to go through together after a Leader Engagement (practice negotiation) with a role-player. The assumption is that there would be some training for the T/Ms on the use of the underlying negotiations framework, language, etc. 4. How much time delay do you think is feasible between test and evaluation of training/debriefing effectiveness? i.e.,considering JRTC exercise schedules within the constraints of 18 months. This will be up to the contractors to work quickly and efficiently in order to have their deliverables ready by the 18 month time limit.
 
Web Link
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/notices/0d7a373e3c66886292c382f22150d03d)
 
Place of Performance
Address: USACE Geospatial Center CONTRACTING DIVISION, 7701 TELEGRAPH RD BLDG 2592 ALEXANDRIA VA
Zip Code: 22315-3864
 
Record
SN02154414-W 20100521/100519235151-0d7a373e3c66886292c382f22150d03d (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  © 1994-2020, Loren Data Corp.