Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF AUGUST 03, 2008 FBO #2442
DOCUMENT

R -- DIACAP Support - Performance Work Statement

Notice Date
8/1/2008
 
Notice Type
Performance Work Statement
 
NAICS
541512 — Computer Systems Design Services
 
Contracting Office
Department of the Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Specialized Contracting Squadron, 2021 First Street West, Randolph AFB, Texas, 78150-4302
 
ZIP Code
78150-4302
 
Solicitation Number
FA3002-08-IT-001
 
Point of Contact
Marcelo M Buckley,, Phone: 210 652-4253
 
E-Mail Address
marcelo.buckley@randolph.af.mil
 
Small Business Set-Aside
Total Small Business
 
Description
Headquarters Air Education and Training Command (HQ AETC) requires DIACAP, SISSU and EITDR and related IA Support Consolidated Tasker Support. See attached performance work statement (PWS) and submit your quote to marcelo.buckley@randolph.af.mil no later than 3:00 pm (CST) on 15 Aug 2008. See below instructions to vendors. Please ensure that you submit the following award criteria requirements that will be used to evaluate your quote. VENDOR PROPOSAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION FOR DoD Information Certification and Accreditation Program (DIACAP) Support Lowest Price Technical Acceptable Evaluation August 1, 2008. Past Performance: 1.What is the vendor past performance record? 2.Have they accomplished work prior with the Air Force? 3.Have they accomplished DIACAP packages for DoD, if so how many and for whom? 4.Does the contractor have a company hierarchy that can be use to address program problems and produce results from upper management during contract performance? Demonstrate Technical Proficiency in the accomplishment of DIACAP packages: 1.Does the vendor exhibit a technical knowledge of governing DoD instructions and Air Force Instructions to be able to integrate and develop Certification and Accreditation packages. 2.Does the contractor show the ability to meet all DIACAP tasks and deliverables associated with Activities 1, 2, 3, and 4 listed in table 1.3 in the PWS? 3.Does the contractor exhibit the ability to document, archive and provide all necessary documentation to the government in an efficient manner? 4.Does the contractor show the ability to perform multiple system taskings and deliverables awarded under a single task order and process documentation simultaneously ensuring timetables are met during the period of performance? 5.Does the contractor show the ability to cooperate between the contractor and the system owner to ensure the appropriate EITDR, FISMA questions are answered and meet minimum solution requirements listed within the database? 6.Can the contractor meet the FISMA requirements memo and initiate it within 10 working days of task order delivery assignment and complete all requirements within 90 working days of initiation? 7.Will the contractor provide a post contract award meeting? Cost: 1.Although cost is important, other intangibles come into play concerning best value. Does the vendor have a capable workforce already within the company or will he have to go out and procure employees for this contract? 2.Is the company local so if problems arise quick meditation can be accomplished? 3.Does the contractor show the capability to determine size and complexity of each network system being tasked for the DIACAP proves and negotiated a fair and reasonable price for the government? Provide Documentation to Support DIACAP Knowledge: 1.Can the vendor provide previous examples of approved DIACAP packages? 2.Can the vendor provide knowledgeable employees that will be able to validate DIACAP packages and integrate the DIACAP process? 3.Can the contractor provide qualified replacement employment in a timely manner? 4.Can contracting personnel abide by the AF Certification and Accreditation (C&A) process by developing and maintaining documentation that meets or exceeds C&A and DoD Information Security requirements for system deliverables IAW DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP), AFI 33-202? On Site Contractor: 1.Will the vendor on Site contractor have a thorough knowledge of Information Assurance to include provide technical guidance on the completion of DIACAP packages as they apply to AETC’s mission to Educate, Train and Recruit? 2.This is important as he/she may be on a team to recommend Information Assurance Controls to Program Managers as they transverse thru the DIACAP C&A process. 3.Will the contractor be able to provide employees that will qualify for security acceptance in accordance to government standards? Surplus Overflow 1.Can the vendor provide additional temporary help may be needed for short durations of time e.g. 30 to 90 days. 2.Does the vendor have a robust staff that could fill in meet the overflow requirements? 3.Can the Contractor provide labor, material and personnel with the experience and education necessary to complete the tasks listed herein? 4.Can the contractor provide periodic status update meetings and program reviews on a monthly basis, or as specified by the Contracting Officer (CO)? Security: 1.Does the vendor provide a Contractor’s Security Officer Representative? 2.Does the contractor show the ability to submit to AETC/A6OE a written/signed Site Visit Request Memorandum, to confirm each individual employee’s current security clearance? 3.Does the contractor proposal supply show that the vendor is familiar and can comply with Government Communication-Computer Security policies and instruction/guidelines? 4.Does the contracting proposal have the ability to comply with procedures concerning all classified materials and how they must be under the control of authorized government personnel at all times? PLEASE PROVIDE QUOTE PER PROJECT (PWS PARA 4.1 TABLE) AS FOLLOWS: ITEM 0001 MAC 1 AT $ _________ ITEM 0002 MAC 2 AT $ _________ ITEM 0003 MAC 3 AT $ _________ See attached performance work statement (PWS) and submit your quote to marcelo.buckley@randolph.af.mil no later than 3:00 pm (CST) on 15 Aug 2008.
 
Web Link
FedBizOpps Complete View
(https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=4864060afbfa8674caff422c177e93a4&tab=core&_cview=1)
 
Document(s)
Performance Work Statement
 
File Name: Performance work statement (AETC IA PWS DIACAP Jul 08 (16).docx)
Link: https://www.fbo.gov//utils/view?id=8d2c44e18040be3db5b5f0d6e4c5ed29
Bytes: 59.74 Kb
 
Note: If links are broken, refer to Point of Contact above or contact the FBO Help Desk at 877-472-3779.
 
Place of Performance
Address: Randolph AFB, Texas, 78150, United States
Zip Code: 78150
 
Record
SN01629506-W 20080803/080801223421-4864060afbfa8674caff422c177e93a4 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  © 1994-2020, Loren Data Corp.