Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 16, 2008 FBO #2302
MODIFICATION

99 -- Shuttle Service

Notice Date
3/14/2008
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
485410 — School and Employee Bus Transportation
 
Contracting Office
Department of Veterans Affairs;VISN 6 Centralized Acquisition Service;300 W. Morgan Street, #700;Durham NC 27701;Durham NC 27701
 
ZIP Code
27701
 
Solicitation Number
VA-246-08-RP-0059
 
Archive Date
5/13/2008
 
Point of Contact
Marsha K Harrington-Evans Contracting Officer 919-956-5541
 
E-Mail Address
Email your questions to Contracting Officer's email address
(Marsha K. Harrington-Evans@va.gov)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
Total Small Business
 
Description
The following are vendor questions and the Government's responses: QUESTION: In reading the request it is stated a vehicle: 3 "14-PASSENGER MINIMUM VEHICLES" TO BE PROVIDED. Regarding this vehicle: Does the contract have a preference or further specification? Does it distinguish between a "van" (single rear wheels), or a shuttle bus/minibus (dual rear wheels)? ANSWER: The Government does not have a preference between single rear wheels and dual rear wheels. Reason for or logic behind question: We offer both types of vehicles: 14 psg VANS, and 14 psg minibuses. The minibuses have dual rear wheels and many of our government contracts have required us to cease using the more traditional 14 psg van (14 passengers + a driver) because the United States DOT has declared them unsafe for more than 6 passengers and illegal to be used for transporting students. Will this concern and federal government safety issue have a bearing on this contract? ANSWER: Yes. This matter will be further researched which may result in bilateral modification of the resulting contract. QUESTION: We are able to offer 14 psg vans or 14 psg minibuses--we just need to know if this is an issue or concern and if there is a preference for a van or a minibus? ANSWER: The Government does not have a preference so long as the vehicle can transport at least 14 passengers. QUESTION: When the specification calls for a "14-PASSENGER MINIMUM" is there a desire or thought that a higher capacity vehicle would be better i.e. 20-25 psg, etc? ANSWER: No, the Government does not have an interest in a 20-25 person vehicle.
 
Web Link
Contracting Officer
(http://www2.fbo.gov/spg/VA/DuVAMC558/DuVAMC558/VA%2D246%2D08%2DRP%2D0059/Marsha K. Harrington-Evans)
 
Place of Performance
Address: Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center;508 Fulton Street;Durham, NC
Zip Code: 27705
Country: USA
 
Record
SN01532762-W 20080316/080314223652 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.