MODIFICATION
R -- PRA Support Services
- Notice Date
- 1/25/2008
- Notice Type
- Modification
- NAICS
- 541990
— All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Contracting Office
- Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Office of Acquisitions and Grants Services, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 2129, Rockville, MD, 20857-0001, UNITED STATES
- ZIP Code
- 20857-0001
- Solicitation Number
- Reference-Number-RFQ1038286
- Response Due
- 1/31/2008
- Archive Date
- 2/15/2008
- Point of Contact
- Roberta Richardson, Contract Specialist , Phone 301-827-7175, Fax 301-827-7106
- E-Mail Address
-
roberta.richardson@fda.hhs.gov
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- This is amendment # 3. The purpose of this amendment is to respond to questions posed. Question: In reference to the subject lined solicitation, is?it a new contract if not is the current contractor permitted to bid? Response: This is not a new requirement. Yes, the current contractor is permitted to bid. Question:Please verify that these are all the pieces I need to submit: Business Proposal Technical Proposal Management Plan Quality Control Plan Resume Response: The solicitation lists the information required. Question: Can you explain to me what the Past Performance Questionnaire is and where I can find that? Response: The questionnaire being used is as follows: Please complete the following questionnaire and return via regular mail or fax to the attention of: This survey pertains to: Department/Component: Contract Number: Date of Survey: Name of Person Completing Survey: Signature of Person Completing Survey: Your Company/Agency: Your Role in this Contract (circle one): Contracting Officer Contract Specialist Project Officer Other Contract Value (including options): $ Performance Period: (including option periods) Type of Contract: Approximate percentage of work being performed (or completed) by subcontractor(s): % Information on subcontractor(s) (where more than % of work was completed by the subcontractor): Subcontractor Program Manager Phone Subcontractor Program Manager Phone Subcontractor Program Manager Phone General description of products/services required under the contract: RATINGS Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support rating shall be noted on page 4. Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle "N/A" (not applicable/no opinion). QUALITY OF SERVICE 1. Compliance with contract requirements 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 2. Accuracy of reports 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 3. Effectiveness of personnel 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 4. Technical Excellence 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A COST CONTROL 1. Record of forecasting and controlling target costs 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 2. Current, accurate and complete billings 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 3. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 4. Cost efficiencies 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE 1. Met interim milestones 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 2. Reliability 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 3. Responsive to technical direction 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 4. Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 5. Met delivery schedules 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 6. Liquidated damages assessed: Yes No (circle one) BUSINESS RELATIONS 1. Effective management, including management of subcontracts 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 3. Responsive to contract requirements 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 4. Notification of problems 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 5. Flexibility 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 6. Pro-active vs reactive 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 7. Effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A CUSTOMER SATISFACTION 1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction. Yes No (circle one) 2. Would you recommend selection of this firm again? Yes No (circle one) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Rating Guidelines QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE COST CONTROL TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE BUSINESS RELATIONS 0-Unsatisfactory Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives Response to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues is not effective 1-Poor Major problems have been encountered Contractor is having major difficulty managing costs effectively Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule Response to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues is marginally effective 2-Fair Some problems have been encountered Contractor is having some problems managing costs effectively Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule Response to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues is somewhat effective 3-Good Minor inefficiencies/ errors have been identified Contractor is usually effective in managing costs Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule Response to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues is usually effective 4-Excellent Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete billings Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule Response to inquiries, technical/ service/ administrative issues is effective 5-Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above four categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent." NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO FEDBIZOPPS ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (25-JAN-2008); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
- Web Link
-
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.fbo.gov/spg/HHS/FDA/DCASC/Reference-Number-RFQ1038286/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: 1350 Piccard Drive Rockville, MD
- Zip Code: 20850
- Country: UNITED STATES
- Zip Code: 20850
- Record
- SN01493473-F 20080127/080126001012 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |