Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF FEBRUARY 19, 2006 FBO #1546
SOURCES SOUGHT

R -- Market Survey for Performance Based Logistics (PBL) for the Fuel System Supply Point (FSSP) system

Notice Date
2/17/2006
 
Notice Type
Sources Sought
 
Contracting Office
TACOM - Warren Acquisition Center, ATTN: AMSTA-AQ-AMB, E Eleven Mile Road, Warren, MI 48397-5000
 
ZIP Code
48397-5000
 
Solicitation Number
W56HZV-06-Q-0565
 
Response Due
3/17/2006
 
Archive Date
5/16/2006
 
Small Business Set-Aside
N/A
 
Description
PERFORMANCE BASED LOGISTICS (PBL) MARKET SURVEY FOR THE Fuel System Supply Point (FSSP) Purpose: The purpose of this survey is to solicit interest in the implementation of Performance Based Logistics (PBL) for the Fuel System Supply Point (FSSP). The Army is looking for potential contractors to perform in the role of Product Support Integrato r/ Product Support Provider for the FSSP. In Accordance With (IAW) AR 70-1 and DOD 5000.1, PBL is the preferred support strategy for materiel systems. The Army will implement PBL on weapon systems in order to provide the war fighter increased operational readiness; increased reliability; enhanced logistics response times; enhanced deployment support; enhanced wartime support; reduction in the logistics footprint, and reduction in logistics costs. The selected PBL contractor will be responsible for some portion of the system logistics support, which could include, but is not limited to, supply chain management (parts support) for field and sustainment level maintenance, sustainment level maintenance (scheduled and unscheduled), and sustainment training. The Army will retain responsibility for the scheduled and unscheduled field maintenance of FSSP units. Operator and maintenance training, and New Equipment Training (NET) will be TACOM responsibility . The system support processes will be transparent to the war fighter. In addition, the Product Manager will be responsible for system configuration, including recommendation and implementation of configuration changes to improve performance, reliability and maintenance. PBL Definition: See Appendix A for Definitions of PBL and other frequently used terminology. Intent: Improvement of Logistics Performance and Cost Reduction for Maintenance Length/Type of Contract: Contract is expected to be a Firm Fixed Price Contract for up to 5 years. Goals. Desired Results and Outcomes: Expected performance results from the PBL provider for the FSSP is achievement of efficiencies that drives the system to an increase in operational availability by; reducing the logistics footprint; reducing maintenance/rep a ir times for scheduled and unscheduled sustainment level maintenance; providing relief to the army from conducting sustainment training, and ultimately reducing O&S costs to the Army. Measurements: Level of performance shall be expressed in measurable outcomes and achievement of those outcomes by objective evaluation. Reduced Logistics Footprint: * Measurable reduction in the time it takes to deliver field and sustainment level spare and repair parts to the requiring organization Reduced maintenance/repair times: * Measurable reduction in the cycle time it takes to return repaired sustainment level equipment/parts to the supply system. Relief from conducting sustainment training: * Measurable reduction in the number of sustainment training classes conducted by the Army. PBL System Candidates: Systems that will be supported using PBL are those systems currently in production, systems currently in the Army fleet, and those undergoing reset/recap. Operational profile is for wartime Operations Tempo (Optempo). See Appendix B for a profile of the FSSP. PBL MARKET SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE FOR THE Fuel System Supply Point (FSSP) Name of Company: Address: City, State, Zip Code: Point of Contact (POC) information: Name: Telephone Number: Email Address: Website Address: What is the business of the your company; i.e. large business, small business, 8 (a)? 1. Describe your companys experience, if any, in providing PBL support to army vehicles or systems. 2. Have you successfully performed the in the role of Product Support Integrator/ Product Support Provider on any other army or DoD vehicles or system? If so, on which vehicles or systems and what was the extent of the support provided? 3. If you have performed under a PBL contract in the past, what are some of the best practic es you have used to be successful? 4. What would be your plan for managing the supply chain (parts support) for field and sustainment level maintenance and integrating that with the current organic system? 5. What potential constraints and boundaries do you anticipated within the responsibilities of managing a PBL support contract? 6. How do you propose the government should measure the specific areas of performance related to reducing the logistics footprint, reducing maintenance/repair times, and providing relief from conducting sustainment training? What recommendations can your organization provide? 7. What would be your plan for reducing maintenance/repair times for scheduled and unscheduled sustainment level maintenance? 8. How would your company manage a sustainment training program and reduce the Army training burden? 9. Would your company be interested in providing PBL support under a long-term contract? 10. Compare and contrast the different strategies your company would utilize in wartime vs. peacetime situations. 11. Do you feel the desired results and outcomes as defined above are attainable? 12. Are there any other areas of logistics support in which your company would be interested in providing a service? Send responses to this market research survey questionnaire to the PM POCs by email: Joe Scott e-mail address: scottjoe@tacom.army.mil and Mathew Marturano e-mail address: marturam@tacom.army.mil Your organization may provide response to all or part of t his questionnaire. Replies to this questionnaire must be received by 24 Mar 05. The response can be marked as confidential. Clearly indicate that the information is Proprietary if appropriate. All participation is voluntary and no compensation will be provided for responding to this survey. The Army appreciates your participation in this survey. APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS Performance Based Logistics (PBL): PBL is a product support strategy in which the logistics requirements are stated as expected results (outcomes), and wherein the responsibility and accountability of meeting these expectations fall on the Product and/or P rogram Managers (PM's), their designated Product Support Integrator (PSI), and their support provider(s). PBL is: - Buying results not resources - Using performance specs not design specs - Buying solution or an outcome not defining the process and methods to achieve a predetermined course of action. - About assigning responsibility to the supplier not the requiring organization. Performance Support Integrator (PSI): The PSI is intended to identify a single source as being responsible and accountable for providing product support to the assigned Defense/Army system. This is designated to an agency (private, public sector or a pri vate/public sector partnership). Product Support Provider (PSP): The PSP is anyone that provides a logistics/support product or service in support of a materiel system. This term applies to all providers that have not been designated by the PM as the PSI. The PSI will be required to ne gotiate Performance Based Agreements (PBA) type arrangements with all PSPs to fulfill their responsibility. Examples of PSPs include: DLA centers, AMC MSC Inventory Materiel Management Centers (IMMCs), Depots, contractors sub-contractors, etc. New Equipment Training: The identification of personnel, training, and training aids and devices and the transfer of knowledge gained during development from the materiel developer/provider to the trainer, user, and supporter. Sustainment Training: Individual and collective training conducted in the unit or resident schools, units, and organizations to ensure continued expertise on the operations, employment, and logistics support of fielded systems or equipment. Sustainment Maintenance: Sustainment maintenance is off-system maintenance and is mainly repair of defective equipment/parts. Sustainment maintenance ret urns repaired equipment/parts to the supply system. Field Maintenance: Field maintenance is on-system maintenance and is mainly replacement of defective parts and preventative maintenance. Field maintenance returns repaired equipment to the soldier. It covers crew, unit, and selected Direct Support (DS) mai ntenance tasks. Some off-system maintenance can be done at field level if, based on task analysis, it is simple to complete or it is critical to mission readiness. Operational Availability: A measure of the degree to which a system is either operating or is capable of operating at any time when used in a typical operational and support environment. APPENDIX B PROFILE FOR THE FSSP System: Fuel System Supply Point (FSSP) Model Designators: Model XM106 (NSN 4930-01-504-2951) and Model XM107 (NSN 4930-01-504-2949) System Description: The Army requires systems to receive, issue, and store fuel delivered from theater supply points by ship, tanker truck and hose-line systems. The Fuel System Supply Point (FSSP) is the primary system used to accomplish this fuel suppo rt mission TBD (To Be Determined). Items listed as TBD are being evaluated during system testing and not available at this time. Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile (OMS/MP): FSSP fulfills the requirement for a rapidly deployed fuel supply systems that is adaptable and flexible to meet fuel supply demands. To satisfy each units requirements the new FSSPs will have configuration flexibility. This is accomplished by using the b asic systems components, such as the pump/engine and filters, and varying total system capacity by adding the quantities of fabric fuel tanks, hoses, and other components. Environmental Conditions. The environmental conditions in which the FSSP will be operated are shown in table below. Climatic Design Types Usage (AR 70-38) (Percent) Hot 20 Basic 80 OEM: WEI. Poplar, MN Availability of TDP: The Army does not own a TDP, the system is procured with a performance based data in accordance with the requirements in purchase description (PD) ATPD 2315D. Configuration Stability: System configuration is currently frozen. Fleet Assessment: FSSP is in development and approaching Full Rate Production (FRP). The initial quantities to be delivered are 252. The has an Expected Useful Life of 25 years. Annual Support Workload (Maintenance AMMS): The FSSP maintenance estimate is based on war-time usage rates of continuous daily operation. Under this scenario the estimated hours to maintain the systems are (TBD) hours of field level maintenance and (TBD) hours of direct and general support maintenance per year. Reliability :. The FSSP demonstrates a mean time between essential function failures of greater then (TBD)) hours. The maintenance ratio shall be less than TBD. Mean time to repair shall be less than (TBD) hour. The maximum time to repair 90% of the rep airs shall be less than TBD hours. Annual Sustainment Parts Cost: Life Cycle Cost Estimate states (TBD) per system for annual replenishment of spare replacements and consumables. Current Organic Support: a. Maintenance. The FSSP technical manual has a two-level maintenance concept. The system Preventive Maintenance, Checks and Services (PMCS) should not exceed 20 minutes before operation and 10 minutes after-operation and will consist primarily o f visual inspection of equipment. During operation, the PMCS will consist of equipment observations, cleaning of equipment being used, and replacement of expendable supplies, as required. b. Manpower and Personnel. The fielding of the FSSP will not result in a requirement for additional personnel. No new MOS or additional skill identifier will be required to operate or maintain the FSSP. The primary operator of the FSSP wi ll be MOS 92F. The FSSP will not add any additional limitations on the operator or maintainer MOSs. c. Supply Support. The FSSP will be supported logistically by military personnel using the most cost and operationally effective means available for the particular situation. Routine maintenance will be provided by system operators and assigned mai ntenance personnel. d. Support Equipment. (1) Test, Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE): Multi-meter and common Test, Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE) will be required. The selection of TMDE will be in accordance with the U.S. Army Regulation 750-43, Army Test, Measu rement and Diagnostic Equipment Program, dated 29 September 98. The FSSP no built-in diagnostic and self-calibrating components. (2) Technical Data. All equipment publications were developed by WEI and will be delivered in hard copy and as an Electronic Technical Manual on CD-ROM. The publications being developed are: the Direct Support maintenance manual, the Repair Pa rts and Special Tools List (RPSTRL). (3) Training and Training Support. Introduction of the FSSP will utilize individual sustainment training, including the use of Automated Systems Approach to Training ASAT (IAW TRADOC Regulation 350-70) and Interactive Multi-media Instruction , a web-based training aide. New Equipment Training will be provided by TACOM and PM PAWS (as the Material Developer) on individual skills necessary for efficient employment and initial fielding the AAFARS IAW AR 350-1. The training will include all nece ssary equipment to support operation, operator preventive maintenance checks and services (PMCS), and organic maintenance of the FSSP. Technical Manuals (TM) will be provided with the hardware and are also available via Army Knowledge Online (AKO). (4) Computer Resources Support. No computer integrated programs will be incorporated within the FSSP. (5) Facilities. No special or new facilities will be required to support the FSSP. TACOM - Warren Acquisition Center ATTN: AMSTA-AQ-AMB, E Eleven Mile Road Warren MI
 
Place of Performance
Address: TACOM - Warren Acquisition Center ATTN: AMSTA-AQ-AMB, E Eleven Mile Road Warren MI
Zip Code: 48397-5000
Country: US
 
Record
SN00990660-W 20060219/060217212545 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  © 1994-2020, Loren Data Corp.