Loren Data's SAM Daily™

FBO DAILY ISSUE OF NOVEMBER 05, 2005 FBO #1440
MODIFICATION

S -- Rental/Launder Shop Towels

Notice Date

11/3/2005
 

Notice Type

Modification
 

NAICS

812332 — Industrial Launderers
 

Contracting Office

Department of the Navy, Naval Supply Systems Command, Fleet and Industrial Supply Center Jacksonville, 110 Yorktown Ave 3rd Floor, Code 200, Jacksonville, FL, 32212-0097
 

ZIP Code

32212-0097
 

Solicitation Number

N68836-06-R-0005
 

Response Due

11/15/2005
 

Archive Date

1/17/2007
 

Description

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY COVER SHEET For Solicitation N68836-06-R-0005 Name and address of offeror questionnaire is being completed for: Name of company completing questionnaire: ________________________________________ Contract Number: _____________________________________________________________ Contract Type: ______________________________________________________________ Contract Amount: ______________________________________________________________ Contract Period of Performance ___________________________________________________ (including all options) Product/Service Description: _____________________________________________________ Name, title and phone number of person completing questionnaire: _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ Length of time your firm has been involved with this company:___________________________ Submit completed Cover Sheet and Survey via facsimile or e-mail to: CONTRACTING DEPARTMENT Fleet & Industrial Supply Center Attn: Dolores Butler, Code 240DB Phone: (904) 542-4452 Fax: (904) 542-1098 e-mail: dolores.butlerh@navy.mil Request return by COB 4 p.m. on: 14 November 2005 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET For CONTRACT: N68836-04-T-0143 RATING SCALE Please use the following ratings to answer the questions. If you are unable to rate an item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark ?NA?. EVALUATION CRITERIA Excellent - The company?s performance was consistently superior. Performance was entirely favorable and you wouldn?t hesitate to do business with them again. Good - The company?s performance was better than average, and you would willingly do business with them again. The contractual performance was mostly favorable and corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. Neutral - No record exists. Average - The company?s performance was satisfactory and you would consider doing business with them again. There were minor performance problems which were satisfactorily corrected. Poor - The company?s performance was entirely unsatisfactory and you would not do business with them again under any circumstances. There were serious performance issues with the contractor for which the contractor?s corrective actions were ineffective. NOTE: For statements indicating ?Poor? or ?Excellent?, please provide an explanation in the comments section of the survey. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY For CONTRACT N68836-04-T-0143 POOR AVERAGE NEUTRAL GOOD EXCELLENT A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: (1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship. (2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports. (3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed. B. COST CONTROL: (1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price. (2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis. (3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort. (4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates. C. SCHEDULE: (1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract. (2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction. D. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS: (1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed. (2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer?s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues. (3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner. POOR AVERAGE NEUTRAL GOOD EXCELLENT (4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues. (5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues. (6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors. (7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program. E. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: (1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the program. (2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC. (3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort. F. KEY PERSONNEL: (1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance. (2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract. G. OTHER: (1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered ?No? provide an explanation.______________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ (2) Was the contract terminated for default? ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered ?Yes?, provide an explanation. ___________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ COMMENTS: (Required for ALL Poor and Excellent Ratings) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
 

Place of Performance

Address: Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida

Zip Code: 32212

Country: United Stated
 

Record

SN00926041-W 20051105/051103212307 (fbodaily.com)
 

Source

FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

---

| FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |