Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF MAY 07, 2005 FBO #1258
MODIFICATION

U -- Tactical Radio Communication Training

Notice Date
5/5/2005
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
611699 — All Other Miscellaneous Schools and Instruction
 
Contracting Office
Other Defense Agencies, U.S. Special Operations Command, USASOC, ATTN:E-2929, Fort Bragg, NC, 28310
 
ZIP Code
28310
 
Solicitation Number
H92239-05-T-0030
 
Response Due
5/16/2005
 
Archive Date
5/31/2005
 
Point of Contact
John Flanders, Contract Specialist, Phone 910-432-8313, Fax 901-432-9345, - Karen Glass, Contracting Officer, Phone 910-432-6145, Fax 910-432-9345,
 
E-Mail Address
flanderj@soc.mil, glasska@soc.mil
 
Small Business Set-Aside
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned
 
Description
Amendment Two (H92239-05-T-0030) This amendment provides responses to contractor's questions: Question 1: What is the total number of personnel needed? Answer: This is a performance-based Performance Work Statement (PWS) and as such the offeror is expected to determine the number of personnel required. Question 2. Will there be Military Cadre? Answer: Negative. Question 3. Because the radio systems listed to be trained on require a COMSEC fill to operate do we need to have instructors who have clearances? Answer: Referencing PWS paragraph C.4., Security, contractor personnel do not require clearances. Question 4. What is the expectation of the client when dealing with COMSEC? Answer: Refer to Question 3. Question 5. Is this intended to be a part of the Pre Mission Training (PMT)? Answer: Referencing PWS paragraph C.1., Scope of Work, following excerpt explains intent of training "…[e]ngender students with the knowledge and skill sets for sustainment and maintaining operational proficiency beyond New Equipment Training…," but, must be read in the context of the entire PWS. Question 6. Is this a refresher course, or is it intended to develop radio skill sets? Answer: Refer to Question 5. Question 7. Is it possible to coordinate efforts with the 18E Base Station for the COMEX? Answer: Negative. However, sat access/frequencies are components of GFP. Question 8. What is the level of support beyond equipment, and can we develop relationships to better support this training? Answer: Government-furnished Property (GFP) and support is covered in detail in PWS paragraph C.5., GFP. Contractor relational interfaces are limited to students, the Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) and the Contracting Officer. Question 9. Will the Program of Instructions (POI) remain consistent with every class? Answer. This is a performance-based Performance Work Statement (PWS) and as such the offeror is expected to provide the course curriculum (i.e., POI) for the requested training. The Government anticipates the course curriculum would be relatively stable over six iterations. Question 10. Will the client provide POI? Answer: Refer to Question 9. Question 11. Who is the point of contact to develop the POI with? Answer: Refer to Question 9. Question 12. When is the intended start date of the first class? Answer: Referencing PWS paragraph C.2.1.1., "The first iteration of TRCT shall be the for the week of 30 May – 03 June 05", indicates the intended start date of the first class is 30 May 05. Question 13. Is there a standard set forth by the Government? Answer: Refer to Questions 5 and 9. Question 14. What are the standards? Answer: Refer to Questions 5 and 9. Question 15. Task, Condition, Standard? Answer: Refer to Questions 5 and 9. Question 16. Can we barrow from 18E Committee? Answer: Negative. There is no reference in the PWS to an "18E Committee." Question 17. Do we have to create all course materials? Answer: Referencing PWS paragraph C.2.2., the contractor provides all material related to the training, with exception of GFP. Question 18. Who is expected to support this class? (Special Operations Academic Facility) Answer: The contractor is expected to support the course IAW the requirements iterated throughout the PWS. There is no reference in the PWS to a "Special Operations Academic Facility". Question 19. Can we expect support? Answer: Refer to Questions 5, 8, 9, 16 and 18. Question 20. What are the parameters on the location of the COMEX? Answer: Parameters of the location for the COMEX are not germane to contractor performance of the requirements iterated in the PWS. NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO WWW.FEDBIZOPPS.GOV ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (05-MAY-2005); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
 
Web Link
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.eps.gov/spg/ODA/USSOCOM/FortBraggNC/H92239-05-T-0030/listing.html)
 
Place of Performance
Address: HQ USASOC HHC 96TH CA BN FORT BRAGG, NC 28310
Zip Code: 28310
Country: USA
 
Record
SN00802079-F 20050507/050505214204 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  © 1994-2020, Loren Data Corp.