MODIFICATION
58 -- Simultaneous Imagery Acquisition Station
- Notice Date
- 9/3/2004
- Notice Type
- Modification
- NAICS
- 334516
— Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research, Naval Research Laboratory/STENNIS, John C. Stennis Space Center, Stennis Space Center, MS, 39529-5004
- ZIP Code
- 39529-5004
- Solicitation Number
- N00173-04-R-RS07
- Response Due
- 9/10/2004
- Archive Date
- 9/2/2005
- Point of Contact
- Richard Sewell, Contract Specialist, Phone 228-688-4571, Fax 228-688-6055, - Patricia Lewis, Contracting Officer, Phone 228-688-5593, Fax 228-688-6055,
- E-Mail Address
-
rsewell@nrlssc.navy.mil, plewis@nrlssc.navy.mil
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- The purpose of this amendment is to respond to technical questions submitted against RFP Number N00173-04-R-RS07. 1. Responses are hereby provided to the following Technical and business questions: Question 1) I would like confirmation that delivery and acceptance is at the NRL facility in Washington, DC (off of Rt. 295), and that any subsequent on site technical support, as stipulated in Section 12.0 (...Four on-site technical help and troubleshooting visits for a period of 1 year...) will also be at this site. If not, what is the physical location for on-site visits? Answer 1) See the synopsis/solicitation for delivery and acceptance location. The requirements stated in Section 12.0 will take place at the same location. Question 2) a) The 35 pound load requirement for the pan/tilt units is much more than the maximum weight of the imaging systems, which are all under 7 lbs. Is there a reason for this? b) Would lighter, more compact units be acceptable? c) Do you require the pan/tilt units to be weather resistant/ weather proof? Answer 2) a) Yes. The Government anticipates using the required system in numerous ways with various possible configurations. b) See SOW Paragraph 8.1.2 for the applicable Government minimum requirements. Proposed solutions to Government requirements are the Offeror's responsibility. c) See Answer 8 to Amendment 0002. Question 3) a) In the NVUGIII specifications (Section 5.0), is the specification (5.1.2,8) of (...Focal Distance of at least 4.2 to 42mm...) critical to your application? b) Would 5.1 to 51mm be acceptable provided it was compatible with the NV tube? c) Is there a reason that the word (...Aviation...) appears in the specification (5.1.1) for the NVUGIII tube? Answer 3) a) Yes. b) See SOW Section 5.1.2(8) and Answer 6 to Amendment 0002 for the applicable Government minimum requirements. c) Yes. It represents the Government minimum requirements. Question 4) Is there a specific device (Manufacturer and model) that you have in mind, or have used to generate the new specifications for the NVUGIII? Answer 4) Proposed solution to the Government requirements are the Offeror's responsibility. NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO WWW.FEDBIZOPPS.GOV ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (03-SEP-2004); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
- Web Link
-
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.eps.gov/spg/DON/ONR/Code3235/N00173-04-R-RS07/listing.html)
- Place of Performance
- Address: CONTRACTOR FACILITY
- Record
- SN00665782-F 20040905/040903213311 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |