Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF AUGUST 13, 2004 FBO #0991
MODIFICATION

R -- Joint Chiefs of Staff, J-8 Program and Budget Analysis Division (PBAD) Analytical Support

Notice Date
8/11/2004
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
541511 — Custom Computer Programming Services
 
Contracting Office
Defense Contracting Command-Washington(DCC-W), ATTN: Policy and Compliance, 5200 Army Pentagon, Room 1D245, Washington, DC 20310-5200
 
ZIP Code
20310-5200
 
Solicitation Number
W74V8H-04-T-0149
 
Response Due
8/17/2004
 
Archive Date
10/16/2004
 
Point of Contact
Edwin Little, 703-692-6084
 
E-Mail Address
Defense Contracting Command-Washington(DCC-W)
(edwin.little@hqda.army.mil)
 
Small Business Set-Aside
Total Small Business
 
Description
The following answers are provided to the questions received in response to RFQ W74V8H-04-T-0149. Question 1: Could you please give us any information you may have on the incumbent organization and the value of the contract? Answer: SeiCorp, Inc is the incumbent contractor with an annual value of $249,809. The scope of the current contract is larger than the scope of the work effort being procured under this requirement. Question 2: Are teaming arrangements allowed? If yes, can these teams include large businesses, as long as a small business is the team lead? May multiple small businesses form a team to perform the work? Answer: Teaming arrangements are allowed. The teaming arrangement must be compliant with FAR clause 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (Dec 1996). Question 3: What is the estimated level of effort for manpower that you envision during the Base Year? Over the course of the contract? Answer: In accordance with the RFQ the Government historical estimate for the requirement is one mid to senior level person per year. Question 4: If I have a candidate that could do the job but would need a little training on the JPAT and CIS Viewer, would this candidate be acceptable? Would training on JPAT and CIS Viewer be possible after contract award? Answer: This question is addressed as part of the first evaluation criteria. The Experience evaluation criteria includes the statement, Also, the contractor should have knowledge of resident Joint Staff quick look analysis tools - Joint Program Analysis Tool (JPAT) or Comptroller Information System (CIS) Viewer. However, contract award will not be solely contingent upon an in-depth knowledge if acceptable information resource alternatives are provided. Training on JPAT and CIS Viewer is not possible; the successful offeror is expected to be reasonably conversant with these data systems. NOTE: THIS NOTICE WAS NOT POSTED TO WWW.FEDBIZOPPS.GOV ON THE DATE INDICATED IN THE NOTICE ITSELF (11-AUG-2004); HOWEVER, IT DID APPEAR IN THE FEDBIZOPPS FTP FEED ON THIS DATE. PLEASE CONTACT fbo.support@gsa.gov REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
 
Web Link
Link to FedBizOpps document.
(http://www.eps.gov/spg/USA/DSS-W/DASW01/W74V8H-04-T-0149/listing.html)
 
Place of Performance
Address: Defense Contracting Command-Washington(DCC-W) ATTN: Policy and Compliance, 5200 Army Pentagon, Room 1D245 Washington DC
Zip Code: 20310-5200
Country: US
 
Record
SN00642102-F 20040813/040811214611 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  © 1994-2020, Loren Data Corp.