SOLICITATION NOTICE
Y -- Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) TEST & SUPPORT FACILITIES, NAWC, PATUXENT RIVER, MD
- Notice Date
- 7/10/2003
- Notice Type
- Solicitation Notice
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Engineering Field Activity, Chesapeake, 1314 Harwood Street Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC, 20374-5018
- ZIP Code
- 20374-5018
- Solicitation Number
- N62477-03-R-0157
- Response Due
- 8/11/2003
- Archive Date
- 8/26/2003
- Point of Contact
- Melissa Rivera, Contract Specialist, Phone 202-685-3155, - Brian Ellis, Contract Specialist, Phone 202-685-5069, Fax 202-433-6193,
- E-Mail Address
-
riverame@efaches.navfac.navy.mil, ellisbr@efaches.navfac.navy.mil
- Description
- This procurement is unrestricted for a Design-Build Project being acquired through the use of the two phase selection process. The procurement will be conducted using source selection procedures and the award will be based on the best value to the government considering the price and non-priced factors, which are cited in this announcement and the solicitation. The Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Test & Support Facilities (Project number-129) at the Naval Air Warfare Center, Patuxent River, MD will provide a proposed maximum 6,615 gross square meters (71,203 sq. ft.) to be comprised of two buildings that are state of the art engineering offices, labs and data processing areas to support the Joint Strike Fighter Program. The Joint Strike Fighter project for the Patuxent River NAS (Naval Air Test Center), will encompass a new testing and support facility. The project consists of two separate structures. Building 1 is a multistory R&D engineering office & lab with administrative, meeting/briefing and data processing areas. Building 2 is to include a high bay engine maintenance area with full coverage bridge crane and engineering space. All buildings will be designed to current force protection and standoff requirements. Site and landscape design must be developed to incorporate these standards and may be utilized to limit the exposure of the facilities to potential hazards. Included in this project is the demolition of several buildings located on the base. It is believed that these facilities contain both lead paint and asbestos. The Statement of Work includes specific information for the removal and demolition of facilities containing these materials. The site shall be cleared and repaired with non-contaminated soils and sod or landscaping. Additionally, an existing hangar shall receive renovations on the first and second floors. The design/build budget at this time is approximately $20 million. Phase I of this acquisition will evaluate offerors considering Past Performance and the following factors: Technical Factor 1 Relevant Construction Experience, Technical Factor 2 ? Design/Build Team Capabilites, Technical Factor 3 ? Working Relationships Between The A-E And The Contractor - Technical Factor 4- Bonding Capability/Corporate Resources, and Technical Factor 5 ? Safety. Potential offerors are notified that the Government expects no greater than five offerors will be invited to participate in Phase II and anticipates a sufficient number of competitors to be three. Offerors invited to participate in Phase II of this acquisition process will be evaluated on Price and the following additional factors: Technical Factor 6 ? Project Schedule, and Technical Factor 7 ? Small Business Subcontracting Effort and Price. The detailed description of this criteria and submission requirements will be included in the solicitation issued under Phase II. Offerors are advised that the combined Technical Factors are considered approximately equal in importance to Price and Past Performance in the selection of the Best Value offeror. All technical factors in Phase I and Phase II are considered equal in importance to each other. Each offeror will receive an evaluation rating for their response to the Phase I criteria. A final evaluation rating will be assigned to each offeror invited to participate in Phase II, at the conclusion of the Phase II evaluation that will take into consideration the rating assigned under Phase I. Offerors proposing as a joint venture shall ensure that complete information required for evaluation is provided for both entities in the partnership. Interested offerors shall submit responses to Phase I based on the following: Technical Factor 1 - Relevant Construction Experience Offerors shall provide a maximum of five projects constructed within the last 7 years that demonstrate relevant experience consisting of the following elements: (1) Design/Build (Identify designer) (2) Large construction projects on or adjacent to active military airfields and/or FAA commercial airfield environments. (3) Similar construction to: a. aircraft engine maintenance high bay structures b. SCIF Labs and/or office buildings c. high voltage electrical distribution for aircraft servicing. Each project submitted need not include all of the elements above. Offerors should provide a brief description of the work performed for each contract referenced and explain how it is similar in scope, size, function and complexity to the subject project. For each project the offeror shall provide the following information: - Project Title - Contract Number & Type (i.e., fixed price, cost) - Customer - Original Award Amount - Final Amount - Award Date - Original Completion Date - Final Completion Date Offerors demonstrating projects consisting of a greater number of the above criteria may receive a more favorable rating for this factor. Technical Factor 2 ? Design/Build Team Capabilities Design The offeror shall identify the designer for this project and submit Forms 254 and 255 for their design partner for evaluation. The offeror shall identify the designer?s key positions that will be dedicated to this project. The Government will determine whether the designer possesses adequate expertise on projects similar in size, scope, complexity and dollar value to that which is required by this RFP. Construction Key positions include the project manager, superintendent, quality control manager and safety manager. The Government recognizes that the offeror may not have individuals assigned to this project by the submission date of proposals and therefore we are seeking to understand the qualifications and degree of experience you require of individuals fulfilling these key positions. Technical Factor 3 ? Working Relationships Between The A-E And The Contractor In relation to this project, describe the A-E?s involvement in the construction phase and the Contractor?s involvement during the design phase. Describe how the design-build team will function as a whole and what benefits the proposed team will bring to the success of this project. Also, describe how Quality Control will be integrated into your proposed teaming approach. Quotes that provide a seamless, cohesive team, both during the design and construction phases of work, will receive a higher rating. Technical Factor 4 - Bonding Capability/Corporate Resources The offeror shall provide information on bonding capabilities to include single project limit, available capacity and the surety?s name, point of contact and phone number (e-mail addresses if available) and/or corporate resources (i.e. lines of credit) to show ability to finance a project of this magnitude. Technical Factor 5 ? Safety The offeror shall provide the following information: ? Submit insurance company Experience Modification Rate (EMR) for previous five years. ? Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) Lost Work Day Incident Rate for the past five years. ? Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) Recordable Incident Rate for the past five years. ? Submit Federal, State, and Municipal OSHA citations for the past five years. Offerors demonstrating a consistent record of good safety will receive a more favorable rating for this factor. The number of incidents alone will not determine the rating. Severity will be evaluated. PAST PERFORMANCE Past Performance information is one indicator of an offeror?s ability to perform this contract successfully. The currency and relevancy of the information, source of information, context of data, and general trends in contractor?s performance shall be taken into consideration. The assessment of the offeror?s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the offeror to the other competitors and establish a level of confidence or risk for successful performance under this contract. Past Performance findings will influence the relative standing of the offeror. Findings will be used to validate proposals against established evaluation criteria. Utilizing the reference information provided under Factor 1, the Government will evaluate the contractor?s past performance on similar projects. Offerors are authorized to provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and corrective actions taken. In investigating the offerors?s past performance, the Government is not limited to the references submitted but may rely on other sources as well. Evaluation of Past Performance will be a subjective assessment. The Government is seeking to determine whether the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to customer satisfaction and timely delivery of services as fair and reasonable pricing. The Government will evaluate the offeror?s record of conforming to specifications and standards of good workmanship, and will evaluate the offeror?s record on cost control/change orders and adherence to contract schedules. Subcontractor management, safety management and other quality control programs will also be reviewed. The Government will examine the offeror?s record for reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction, and in general, the offeror?s business-like concern for the interest of the customer. Offerors will be given an opportunity to address unfavorable reports of past performance, and the offeror?s response will be taken into consideration. Past Performance questionnaires shall be obtained by the offeror through the NAVFAC E-Solicitation Web (e-sol website) at http://esol.navfac.navy.mil In response to Past Performance the offeror is requested to submit five past performance surveys (Past Performance surveys shall be sent to the offerors references and shall be sent back to the offeror in a sealed envelope and signed across the seal and submitted with the other Phase I information). Additionally, a review of ACASS/CCASS will be performed and evaluated for offerors with past Government experience. Responses to Phase I shall be submitted in an original and five copies and are due at the office of Engineering Field Activity Chesapeake, 1314 Harwood Street, SE, Building 212, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374. Submission must be delivered to the mailroom on the first floor, date stamped and placed in the bid box. Submissions are due by 10:00 am EST on 11 August 2003. Notification of the Governments? decision of whether an offeror is or is not invited to participate in Phase II will be promptly provided to all firms submitting a response to this announcement. Those firms selected to participate in Phase II will be provided the solicitation package, invited to attend a pre-proposal conference/site visit and will submit proposals responding to the criteria set forth in the solicitation. The Government reserves the right, and the solicitation may require, oral presentation by each offeror under Phase II of this acquisition process. It is anticipated that award of a contract will occur in November 2003. All attachments to be filled out and submitted under Phase I can be obtained through the NAVFAC E-Solicitation Web (e-sol website) at http://esol.navfac.navy.mil Please direct any questions regarding this announcement to Ronald B. Rosenberg, Contract Specialist, phone 202-685-8049 (e-mail Rosenbergrb@EFACHES.NAVFAC.NAVY.MIL)
- Place of Performance
- Address: PATUXENT RIVER, MD
- Country: USA
- Country: USA
- Record
- SN00368791-W 20030712/030710213923 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |